When performing a GET on text fields using the headless API and results in empty contents, the output returns ”” instead of being skipped. This change gives more flexibility to the users to decide what each user will do with the information.

Users should review all GET requests on text fields to adapt to this change.

• Users subscribed to a web content or a folder will not receive notifications for assets in the pending state unless they are directly involved in the workflow review process

• This change is meant to match the current behavior of Documents & Media

• Granting “Update” Permissions: Granting “Update” permissions to a role enables the user to edit a folder's properties, like its name and description.

• Granting “Advance Update” Permissions: Granting “Advance Update” permissions to a role enables the user to update the workflow associated with a folder. The folder's properties, such as name and description fields, remain disabled and cannot be edited.

When a user is deleted in Analytics Cloud, they will first be suppressed before being permanently deleted. As a result, you will see two requests per user—one for suppression and another for deletion.

Previously, each user deletion generated two separate requests. Now, all users are grouped into a single suppression and deletion request, reducing the number of requests. For example, each request will now contain a list of all affected email addresses instead of generating individual requests per user.

Users can verify deletion logs in:
Analytics Cloud > Settings > Data Control & Privacy > Request Log.

What changed?
A new bulk operation feature allows users to select and manage multiple changes within a publication. Users can now move or discard changes in bulk via a management bar. This simplifies managing large publications.

Why was this change made?
Previously, users had to manage each change individually, which was time-consuming. This change enhances user efficiency and reduces the administrative burden, making the platform more scalable for large publications.

Is the new behavior better for users?
It significantly saves time and effort, making it easier to manage multiple changes quickly. This results in a smoother, faster user experience when handling large volumes of changes.

Who is affected?
Users who manage large publications or need to handle multiple changes will benefit from this update. It streamlines the process for users who frequently move or discard changes.

How should I update my features or implementation to better adopt the breaking change?
If needed, this feature can be enabled/disabled through the Feature Flag on Instance Settings > Feature Flag > feature.flag.LPS-171364=true or Bulk Actions for Publications (LPD-20183)

What changed?
A publication size classification is now displayed in the review changes screen, categorizing publications as Light, Medium, or Large based on their size. A popover explanation appears when users hover over the classification, providing insight into the potential impact of the publication size on the publishing process.

Why was this change made?
This change helps users understand the scale of their publications, allowing them to plan the publishing process better. It aims to prevent performance issues and reduce conflicts by encouraging users to allocate more time for larger publications.

Is the new behavior better for users?
The new classification provides clearer insight into the publication's complexity, helping users avoid unexpected delays. It also allows them to take proactive steps in managing their workflow, ensuring smoother publishing processes.

Who is affected?
All publication users are affected, but it is more focuesd on user who deal with multiple changes and users with deadlines to accomplish when publishing their website.

How should I update my features or implementation to better adopt the breaking change?
If needed, this feature require the Feature Flag on Instance Settings > Feature Flag > Additional Context in Publications Toolbar (LPD-20556) to work fully.

What changed?
The review change screen now includes a progress bar that provides real-time visual feedback during the publication process. Users will see the progress bar while waiting for their publication to go live, indicating how much time remains in the publishing process.

Why was this change made?
Previously, users had no visual indication of how long the publishing process would take. This change improves user experience by providing transparency and better manage their expectations.

Is the new behavior better for users?
The new progress bar enhances user satisfaction by offering clear, real-time feedback. It helps users understand the publishing timeline, reducing uncertainty during the process.

Who is affected?
All publication users are affected, but the focus is on those handling large or complex publications, where waiting times could previously be unclear.

How should I update my features or implementation to better adopt the breaking change?
No change is needed in the current process.