• What changed?
  Javascript from fragments is now included in the page using a <script> of type module, instead of embedding the code in a function

• Why was this change made?
  We wanted to leverage all the features available in the javascript modules: JavaScript modules - JavaScript | MDN
  For example: the ability to use import statements

• What is affected?
  Code that is not supported directly in a <script> tag of type module
  For example:

  • return statements outside the scope of a function

  • Automatic variable declaration, for example myVariable = 'value'

• How should I update my features or implementation to better adopt the breaking change?
  Code should be fairly easy to migrate, just remove any return statement, and for the variable declaration you either use let or const next to the variable name const myVariable = 'value'
  As a temporary workaround (would be removed soon), we have added disable to this feature. You have to go to Instance Settings -> Page Fragments -> Fragment Javascript and disable the checkbox

Changed the methods of adding a Collection to specify the ERC when is created. If a customer has Java code that is using these services they should modify it to specify the ERC (or Null) when is called.

The functionality of the Date Facet widget introduced under a Developer FF in LPS-153839 in 2024.Q1, has been integrated into the Custom Facet and now available as GA. The Date Facet widget is no longer available.

Refer to the Date Range and Range Aggregation in the Custom Facet under Search for more details.

What Changed?

Previously, some Modification Conflicts and all Modification Deletion conflicts required manual resolution. These cases would show up in the Checking Changes screen, requiring manual user action to be resolved. They are now automatically resolved by overwriting production with the changes made in the publication and won't be displayed in the Checking Changes screen.

Why Was This Change Made?

The previous behavior required users to manually address many types of conflicts, which was usually a time-consuming effort. The new behavior reduces the friction in the publishing process while guaranteeing publications’ users they will be able to publish the needed modifications.

Who Is Affected?
All publication users are affected, but the focus is on the ones responsible for solving the conflicts and publishing the content.

How Should I Update My Features or Implementation to Better Adopt the Breaking Change?

Consider that now Publications’s users have more power to overwrite production changes. If you understand that the end-user scenario still requires human verification in Modification Deletion cases, the previous behavior can be restored by using the Modification Deletion Conflicts Toggle on Instance Settings > Publications.